Wednesday, 30 December 2015

SOHA Found!



Once again the boys from the Bluff Creek Project give us something substantial before 2015 comes to a close. Jamie and Steven have been hot on the trail of the location of Matt Johnson's SOHA location since at least this past summer.
  Johnson repeatedly mocked and taunted the duo, telling them that they would never set foot at SOHA (or something like that). It looks like Steven and Jamie have the last laugh.

 I won't do too much talking because the photos and videos speak for themselves. The only reason I am posting this is because I heard that the team at Johnson's Facebook group have been busy deleting all references to the site being found. Tsk, tsk. What a totalitarian approach they have.









According to Steven and Jamie, there are houses within a mile of this deep-in-the-woods location and dogs could be heard barking from the site.


Here are a couple of videos of the men at SOHA. Steven has many more videos on his Coalition page on Facebook.Coalition for Critical Thinking in Bigfoot






EDIT:
        
" FINDING SOFA group here, especially Mitchell Wilson, who was the one who finally located the site on Google Earth. There are a number of others. I'm just waiting on for permission to name them. With us at first were Chris Burbick and "Anonymous," then expanding to include Phil Poling, Mitchell, Richard Allen (Special Cuntsultant), and Kirk Brandenburg. Many anonymous sources helped our group along, some of them inadvertently as they are TS-USA minions. Rictor Riolo and ScoutLee Finch helped, and hooked us up with some other sources. It was a very WIDE NET we used to catch this bird with all the clues good and bad."

                             ~Steven Streufert

43 comments:

  1. So when are you guys going to debunk his claims, all you have done was make claims and proved nothing in the "few minutes" you were there. If you are going to do research then man up and do it, don't be a couple of arm chair wannabes. Also for future reference, if you are going to use the word debunk you need to come up with some type of evidence to prove it. Sorry the.. "oh I think the portal might be that puddle over there" as debunked evidence is so laughable. Kinda making a mockery of yourselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The mockery is Matthew Johnson. The onus is on him to prove his portal is real and he has failed to do so.
      The point is that SOHA is nowhere deep in the woods. It's an insignificant spot that has been logged recently.
      I feel sorry for anyone that hitched their wagon to Johnson and his fraud train. Johnson has not proven onbe of his claims in nine years. That must suck.

      Delete
    2. He has eyewitness evidence.. which is works as a form of evidence in the court of law. Can they be lying.. sure. Has anyone proved that they are.. no.. not that I have seen.

      From my understanding he never said it was deep in the wood.. in fact I am pretty sure in one of the videos testimonials she said it wasn't that deep in the woods.
      I also don't ever think he said that they lived there at the SOHA site, rather that they came in from surrounding areas.

      Delete
    3. I'm not any train either.. just want to see some debunking with some class you know??

      samsquatch2016

      Delete
    4. Eyewitness testimony actually isn't really considered good evidence in the court of law. In fact, it's considered one of the worst pieces of evidence to have in court.

      The fact is, normal wild animals don't like to live near houses and barking dogs. Coyotes maybe, but they are scavengers, and still keep their distance. To think that the most elusive land mammal in history, has been living near people's backwards and near walking trails is laughable.

      This guy is a joke. No one needs to expose him, common sense should do that for you.

      Delete
    5. We just found the place. How do you expect a full evaluation and peer review to be done already? We went, and what we saw was tremendously underwhelming. That's where things stand for now.

      Delete
    6. So two years to find the place. It was bullshit two years ago. He's not the only woo out there but the obsessing on DR J is pointless.

      Delete
    7. To funny. A guy in our group found the SoHa just by looking at google maps. He claims WAha is pretty much in MJs backyard

      Delete
  2. Uh ... does the portal really require debunking? Seriously?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for bringing the outrageous claims of Johnsons to light, Randy.
    You're right; the burden of proof is on him and NO, the opinion of the people who've been there is hearsay - and doesn't count as evidence.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's clear that you people know nothing of Sasquatch and their capabilities and goals. Their capable of interdimensional travel and their goal is to connect with certain people! Johnson is one of those people. I am one of those people. Doesn't matter WHERE this occurs, it doesn't have to be in deep mountainous terrain (SOHA is as good a place as any) I have routine visits from a clan, in my backyard! It is the PERSON NOT the PLACE!!! Unfortunately, most will never know the truth and Sasquatch know who they can trust

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's clear that you have no idea what the scientific method requires.
      You say Bigfoot visit you. The onus is on you to prove your claims. You can't state your opinions as facts, no matter how much you kick and scream.
      There is no evidence of interdimensional beings. People like you make up excuses as to why others can't see what you claim to see and anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see that you're sadly mistaken and misguided.
      If you have nothing to prove, that's fine. Just don't state your subjective opinions as though they were factual information.
      Matt Johnson has made outrageous claims and in nine years he has failed to produce anything viable. Opinions of sycophants must be excluded because the individuals already have biases and predetermined ideas of what will, or what should have, taken place on any given visit.
      Snow fall becomes Bigfoot brushing branches. Thieving raccoons become playful juvenile Bigfoot and owl hoots become Bigfoot language.
      Johnson has failed to use any sort of measurable science in order to give some weight to his claims but YOU people are too arrogant and stubborn to admit it.

      Delete
    2. They're.....not their.

      Delete
    3. Nope this was 2 years of OCD and self righteousness

      Delete
    4. It's calling out bullshit when and where it needs to be called out.

      Delete
  5. Hey 7:12, lets see some proof of your interdimensional bigfeets. I'm sure you have some pictures??

    ReplyDelete
  6. Disparaging any research location due to its propinquity to human habitation is irrelevant provided there is an accessible corridor of ingress and egress for the Big Guys to travel. The element of reported high strangeness, on the other hand, is a bone of contention which remains as unresolvable as telepathy itself. But let's keep in mind that ten years ago cloaking (rendering an object invisible) was thought to be science fiction whereas now it is a proven and repeatable scientific fact.
    - Dudlow

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Modern human technology has no relevance with regards to Bigfoot and cloaking. The fact is that no mammal or primate has the ability to naturally render itself invisible by means of manipulating its skin tone, texture, hair/fur colour etc.
      That argument has no place in the discussion. As well, telepathy and "cloaking" are unrelated to each other. There is no evidence that anyone or any land animal can think itself invisible.
      Even sea creatures don't turn invisible. No natural creature on earth does, except for the recently discovered tiny creature. Its name eludes me and I have not read enough on the subject to make an informed comment.
      Whether or not there is an access way for Bigfoot to freely travel to and from SOHA remains to be seen because so far we have no evidence of any Bigfoot activity.
      Suspicious and heavily edited audio present obvious problems. So does the testimony of witnesses that are friends with Matt Johnson, due to their bias and impartiality. A scientific approach to the matter was not conducted, so it remains inconclusive at best.
      Any evidence or non-evidence is based on subjective opinions.

      Delete
  7. If you Google biological cloaking you will find that a number of sea creatures have been known for a number of decades to naturally cloak themselves; which is when and why science originally got the idea to pursue the phenomenon as a legitimate research activity. Therefore only those uneducated in these matters would contend that both biological cloaking and man's scientific mimicry of the effect are irrelevant. Nice try, but nothing more than a feeble attempt at the tired old straw man defense which, as everybody knows, simply doesn't hold water. And, by the way, to satisfy your criteria, both natural biological and man made cloaking are nowadays scientifically validated and accepted and therefore relevant to the discussion.

    As any longtime BF researcher knows, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Perhaps your observational skills are not up to the task of detecting BF activity. They can be very stealthy, you know.

    Yes, your naysaying opinions are as entirely subjective as the contentions of BF experiencers. Stalemate. But as I used to say many years ago, "Open minds open doors. Closed minds close doors." I'd rather keep my brain open for business.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your argument is hollow. NO animal on earth can render itself invisible. You confuse camouflage with cloaking. Claoking was discovered by the Romulans in Star Trek.
      There is no biological cloaking. If you're so smart and in the know, name three animals that can cloak. One of them must be a land based mammal.
      Sea creatures do not cloak, but nice try. Perhaps it is you who is not up to the task, smart ass.
      While you're at it, get a dictionary. Active camouflage is not rendering itself invisible, as in disappearing. Learn the difference between the two words as they are not interchangeable.

      Delete
    2. Bigfoot don't use modern technology to render themselves invisible either, Einstein. No animal on earth has the ability to cloak.

      Delete
    3. Someone needs to teach you how to Google. It would open many doors for you.

      Delete
    4. You guys should stop thinking you're the bigfoot police. You're not.

      Delete
    5. You should quit crying like a baby.

      Delete
  8. I do so love the fighting. Opinions are like a-holes everyone has one.... or 2 or 10 in the bigfoot field.
    I also like to poop in the woods! Keep up the good arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Come on Randy, you know magic can't be proven. So if Bigfoot is magic then they don't have to prove anything they claim. It's so easy for people like Johnson to be Gods in their field "I said so, so there fore it must be true". No proof needed in the wee little minds of his followers. Brakefoot

    ReplyDelete
  10. https://youtu.be/-3ydWQgeVfo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for the link to Matt trying to perform damage control in his worthless video. I could only handle one minute of his babbling.

      Delete
  11. 42 24'25.02"
    123 31'17.38"

    ReplyDelete
  12. You guys are great keep up the good work. Now if you will excuse me I am going to portal over to my office so I don't have to drive there. Wish the videos worked.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I wonder why the author didn't include the screen shots of their group wanting to hoax the SOHA site? The screen shot of Steven saying it was his group that wanted to hoax Soha. Jamie did say half of the OP was wanting to hoax, congratulations on associating them with your hoaxing plans. Google is indexing their antics, so whenever anyone does a search on their name it will show what liars they are. You wanted to be famous guys, well there you go. lol..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nobody wanted to hoax anyone but you keep holding on to that sliver of hope if it helps you sleep.
      Whiner

      Delete
  14. Self righteous pursuit to nowhere

    ReplyDelete
  15. Have you listened to the Davies and Carlson interview yet? The stuff they say is a lot more crazy sounding than Dr J has said. So after listening to this interview, let me know if you think they are lying or were hoaxed. If they were hoaxed please explain how they did it. No commenting if you haven't listened to the interview. Listen first, then comment. http://binnallofamerica.com/boaa100415.html

    ReplyDelete
  16. Randy,
    This paragraph:
    "It's clear that you have no idea what the scientific method requires. You say Bigfoot visit you. The onus is on you to prove your claims. You can't state your opinions as facts, no matter how much you kick and scream.
    There is no evidence of interdimensional beings. People like you make up excuses as to why others can't see what you claim to see and anyone with an IQ above room temperature can see that you're sadly mistaken and misguided.
    If you have nothing to prove, that's fine. Just don't state your subjective opinions as though they were factual information."

    probably your best work... EVER. Job well done!

    -Hopeful Optimistic no more

    ReplyDelete
  17. I don't agree with what was done and I do not believe in portals and such. Overall it was done in a mean spirited way.

    ReplyDelete
  18. You guys are doing great work keep it up. Question have you seen the Mountain Monster Hunter show where a bigfoot had been shot by a hunter and another team shot and killed it? Richard

    ReplyDelete
  19. Interesting collection of ad hominems and false dilemmas with a straw man mixture..
    The eye witness claims you throw under the bus..fair enough..so there goes most flesh and blood big footery..animals dont "cloak" brilliant...paranormal is out..because its nuts right..but not been able ti find a monsterous ape like thing..ever..is because its "really good at hiding"...and how you giants of the mind are going to "debunk" previous oral statements is just..demented..location to houses makes the whole thing look bad...because...?......seriously..thats your best shot...Dr J was obviously hit by the stupid stick..but hiss "critics" are on the same level...go read some flipping books on fortean phenomena for god sake and stop dancing round like pseudo sceptics..who..snigger..believe in a monsterous flesh and blood beasties..ya cant have it both ways..sceptics dont believe in big foot...and in another hundred years..the next generations will still be running around..and not bat an eye that they cannot find anything..ya dont get it do ya..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do you have a point to make in your long winded comment?
      Who said I didn't think that Bigfoot exists?
      Is there any proof or evidence to show that it DOES exist? Nope, nothing.
      Matthew Johnson is either a liar, con and hoaxer or he has mental problems. I choose the former. he is a fraud so deal with it.
      If you're one of his cult followers, ask Johnson to provide anything to back up his wild and outlandish claims. He can't.
      Why do I need to read fortean anything? There is no proof or valid evidence to show that magic is real.
      Givew your head a shake, skippy.

      Delete